When the cryptocurrency trade FTX was driving excessive, Sam Bankman-Fried, the corporate founder, communicated with the general public in a relentless torrent of tweets, TV interviews and pronouncements in entrance of Congress.
Now as Mr. Bankman-Fried testifies at his fraud trial in Manhattan, these phrases have come again to hang-out him.
On Monday, a federal prosecutor bombarded the disgraced crypto mogul with questions as he took the stand for a second day of testimony in federal court docket. Over 4 hours, Danielle Sassoon, the prosecutor, grilled Mr. Bankman-Fried about inconsistencies between his public statements and the way he ran his crypto empire earlier than it collapsed spectacularly in November.
Mr. Bankman-Fried, 31, sporting a light-weight grey go well with and purple tie, answered in curt “yeps” or “nos,” eschewing the sometimes-winding statements he gave at different factors within the trial. Sometimes rocking backwards and forwards in his chair, he insisted that he couldn’t bear in mind a lot of what he had stated publicly, together with about FTX’s dealing with of shoppers deposits and the conflicts of curiosity that plagued his companies.
“I’m not sure,” Mr. Bankman-Fried responded time and again, as Ms. Sassoon requested about statements he had made when he was chief govt of FTX. “I can’t recall,” he stated at different factors.
The cross-examination uncovered cracks in Mr. Bankman-Fried’s claims, dealing a doubtlessly severe blow to his credibility with the jury of 9 girls and three males who will resolve his destiny. On a big projector display, Ms. Sassoon displayed statements that appeared to indicate Mr. Bankman-Fried saying one factor in public, then appearing in another way in non-public. After having him recount FTX’s outreach to authorities officers in Washington, Ms. Sassoon requested him to repeat non-public messages during which he used an expletive to dismiss regulators as ineffective.
Mr. Bankman-Fried’s testimony was probably the most anticipated second of the trial, which has shined a highlight on hubris and rampant risk-taking throughout the crypto trade. Once the face of crypto’s efforts to woo the general public, Mr. Bankman-Fried is now broadly in comparison with among the most infamous fraudsters in latest historical past, together with Elizabeth Holmes, the founding father of the failed blood-testing start-up Theranos.
Taking the stand was dangerous. Criminal defendants normally keep away from testifying in order that prosecutors don’t have an opportunity to query them. But the primary few weeks of the trial have been so damaging for Mr. Bankman-Fried, as a procession of presidency witnesses testified that he lied to the general public and stole from FTX prospects, that he was left with few different choices to salvage the case.
In December, federal prosecutors charged Mr. Bankman-Fried with orchestrating a sweeping scheme to steal as a lot as $10 billion from FTX’s prospects. They stated he had spent the cash on extravagant initiatives, together with enterprise capital investments, political contributions and luxurious actual property purchases within the Bahamas, the place FTX was based mostly. Mr. Bankman-Fried was additionally accused of making a secret again door in FTX’s code that allowed a hedge fund he based, Alameda Research, to grab billions of {dollars} in buyer funds.
He has pleaded not responsible to seven counts of fraud, conspiracy and cash laundering, and will face what quantities to a life sentence if convicted.
Not lengthy after FTX imploded, three of Mr. Bankman-Fried’s closest associates — Caroline Ellison, Nishad Singh and Gary Wang — pleaded responsible to fraud and agreed to cooperate with the federal government, hoping for lenient sentences. All three have testified towards Mr. Bankman-Fried on the trial, telling the jury that they lied and stole for years at his behest.
Mr. Bankman-Fried took the stand on Friday to inform his aspect of the story. Under questioning from his personal lawyer, he forged himself as a hardworking founder who was overwhelmed by his duties and let main enterprise points go unaddressed. He denied that he had dedicated fraud, and blamed his colleagues for most of the issues that led to FTX’s collapse.
On Monday, it was the prosecution’s flip to ask questions. The courtroom was full of spectators, together with Mr. Bankman-Fried’s mother and father — the regulation professors Joe Bankman and Barbara Fried — and Damian Williams, the highest federal prosecutor in New York. Ms. Sassoon’s mom additionally attended.
Ms. Sassoon centered a lot of her questions on Mr. Bankman-Fried’s feedback in interviews, in congressional testimony and on Twitter. She pressed him on inconsistent statements he had made through the years about his famously unkempt hair, and identified his frequent use of personal planes, suggesting that his ostensibly humble way of life was a public relations efficiency. The non-public flights value a complete of $15 million, Ms. Sassoon stated.
She additionally grilled him about interviews he gave earlier than FTX collapsed, during which he insisted that Alameda had no particular privileges as a buyer buying and selling on the trade. Over the primary three weeks of the trial, the prosecution’s witnesses testified that the alternative had been true, and that Mr. Bankman-Fried had channeled billions of {dollars} to Alameda.
At one level, Ms. Sassoon walked to the witness stand and introduced Mr. Bankman-Fried with a duplicate of “Number Go Up,” a brand new e-book about crypto by the Bloomberg News reporter Zeke Faux. She pointed to an interview within the e-book during which Mr. Bankman-Fried appeared to contradict his earlier claims, acknowledging that Alameda had particular privileges.
Ms. Sassoon requested if seeing the e-book refreshed Mr. Bankman-Fried’s reminiscence of that acknowledgment. “No, it doesn’t,” he replied.
Eventually, Mr. Bankman-Fried, who is anticipated to return to the stand on Tuesday, made some concessions. He acknowledged that Alameda had a $65 billion line of credit score with FTX, primarily permitting it to borrow limitless funds. The second-largest credit score line, which FTX had with one other agency, was $150 million, he stated.
But time and again, Mr. Bankman-Fried stated he couldn’t bear in mind varied statements about Alameda and FTX that reporters had attributed to him. He didn’t learn all of the articles, he stated, and he typically objected to the reporting.
“I disagreed with basically every article written about me” after FTX collapsed, he stated.
Mr. Bankman-Fried stated he additionally couldn’t bear in mind most of the key moments within the narrative that prosecutors had introduced in regards to the fall of FTX. He stated he didn’t recall telling former colleagues to switch to Alameda among the $2 billion that FTX had raised from enterprise capital companies. Prosecutors have charged that Mr. Bankman-Fried misappropriated cash from FTX’s enterprise traders in addition to its prospects.
At one level, Ms. Sassoon requested Mr. Bankman-Fried whether or not he recalled making statements in regards to the significance of safeguarding buyer funds. He hemmed and hawed, finally saying he couldn’t bear in mind.
“I made a lot of public statements,” he stated.
Then Ms. Sassoon confirmed the jury a tweet that Mr. Bankman-Fried had posted about that precise difficulty.
“And, as always, our users’ funds and safety come first,” he had written.