The California Public Utilities Commission has suspended Cruise’s authority to hold and cost passengers for its robotaxi service, following related action from the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles.
The CPUC can also be “independently carrying out investigatory activities into recent incidents involving passenger service,” Terrie Prosper, director of stories and outreach on the CPUC, informed Ztoog.
The agency’s choice comes simply three months after it awarded Cruise the ultimate vital permits to cost passengers for robotaxi rides in San Francisco. Until then, Cruise had been operating a free service within the metropolis. The CPUC’s suspension additionally follows the California Department of Motor Vehicle’s suspension of Cruise’s deployment and driverless testing permits Tuesday.
The DMV’s order of suspension, which Ztoog has considered, states that Cruise withheld video footage from an ongoing investigation. The DMV was investigating Cruise following a collection of incidents, particularly one on October 2 that left a pedestrian, who had been initially hit by a human-driven automobile, caught underneath a Cruise robotaxi after which dragged for 20 ft at 7 miles per hour by the AV.
The agency stated when it met with Cruise representatives on October 3 to view footage of the accident, Cruise solely introduced the AV’s preliminary cease following a hard-brake maneuver. The subsequent motion of the AV to carry out a “pullover maneuver,” which resulted within the pedestrian being dragged, was overlooked, based on the DMV. (Cruise additionally confirmed Ztoog an edited model of the occasion, omitting the following motion. At the time, Cruise introduced it as the complete video).
The DMV stated one other authorities agency alerted it to the lacking footage, prompting it to request the complete video from Cruise, which the corporate offered on October 13.
In a tweet on Tuesday, Cruise denied the DMV’s claims and stated it proactively shared info with the DMV, the CPUC and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), together with the complete video.
NHTSA can also be investigating Cruise with reference to this occasion, plus quite a few different incidents similar to Cruise’s collision with an emergency car and dozens of situations of robotaxis malfunctioning and blocking site visitors and first responders.
The CPUC didn’t affirm or deny Cruise’s declare that it had shared the complete video with the agency instantly after the October 2 accident.
“Our Consumer Protection and Enforcement Division is actively gathering, reviewing, and analyzing incident-related information from Cruise as part of our ongoing evaluation of its passenger service operations and assessment of any possible violations,” stated Prosper. “We will maintain close coordination with the California DMV throughout the ongoing investigation.”
The CPUC additionally didn’t reply to Ztoog’s inquiry concerning whether or not the agency will reinstate Cruise’s permits if and when the DMV does.
Despite the truth that the DMV first gave Cruise permission to check and deploy its AVs throughout San Francisco, the CPUC acquired pushback for giving Cruise the go-ahead to develop its commercial service city-wide and 24/7. The CPUC’s August listening to to find out growth for Cruise and its competitor Waymo included hours of protestations from opponents who feared for public security and have been involved about site visitors stream.
A month after Cruise acquired its CPUC permit, town of San Francisco formally requested state regulators redo their choice.