There’s hardly ever time to put in writing about each cool science-y story that comes our approach. So this yr, we’re as soon as once more operating a particular Twelve Days of Christmas collection of posts, highlighting one science story that fell by way of the cracks in 2020, every day from December 25 by way of January 5. Today: Archaeologists relied on chemical clues and methods like FTIR spectroscopy and archaeomagnetic evaluation to reconstruct the burning of Jerusalem by Babylonian forces round 586 BCE.
Archaeologists have uncovered new proof in help of Biblical accounts of the siege and burning of the metropolis of Jerusalem by the Babylonians round 586 BCE, in response to a September paper printed in the Journal of Archaeological Science.
The Hebrew bible comprises the solely account of this momentous occasion, which included the destruction of Solomon’s Temple. “The Babylonian chronicles from these years were not preserved,” co-author Nitsan Shalom of Tel Aviv University in Israel informed New Scientist. According to the biblical account, “There was a violent and complete destruction, the whole city was burned and it stayed completely empty, like the descriptions you see in [the Book of] Lamentations about the city deserted and in complete misery.”
Judah was a vassal kingdom of Babylon throughout the late seventh century BCE, underneath the rule of Nebuchadnezzar II. This didn’t sit properly with Judah’s king, Jehoiakim, who revolted towards the Babylonian king in 601 BCE regardless of being warned not to take action by the prophet Jeremiah. He stopped paying the required tribute and sided with Egypt when Nebuchadnezzar tried (and failed) to in invade that nation. Jehoiakim died and his son Jeconiah succeeded him when Nebuchadnezzar’s forces besieged Jerusalem in 597 BCE. The metropolis was pillaged and Jeconiah surrendered and was deported to Babylon for his hassle, together with a considerable portion of Judah’s inhabitants. (The Book of Kings places the quantity at 10,000.) His uncle Zedekiah turned king of Judah.
Zedekiah additionally chafed underneath Babylonian rule and revolted in flip, refusing to pay the required tribute and looking for alliance with the Egyptian pharaoh Hophra. This resulted in a brutal 30-month siege by Nebuchadnezzar’s forces towards Judah and its capital, Jerusalem. Eventually the Babylonians prevailed once more, breaking by way of the metropolis partitions to overcome Jerusalem. Zedekiah was pressured to look at his sons killed and was then blinded, sure, and brought to Babylon as a prisoner. This time Nebuchadnezzar was much less merciful and ordered his troops to utterly destroy Jerusalem and pull down the wall round 586 BCE.
There is archaeological proof to help the account of the metropolis being destroyed by hearth, together with close by villages and cities on the western border. Three residential constructions have been excavated between 1978 and 1982 and located to comprise burned picket beams relationship to round 586 BCE. Archaeologists additionally discovered ash and burned picket beams from the similar time interval after they excavated a number of constructions at the Giv’ati Parking Lot archaeological web site, near the assumed location of Solomon’s Temple. Samples taken from a plaster ground confirmed publicity to excessive temperatures of a minimum of 600 levels Celsius
However, it wasn’t doable to find out from that proof whether or not the fires have been intentional or unintentional, or the place the hearth began if it was certainly intentional. For this newest analysis, Shalom and her colleagues targeted on the two-story Building 100 at the Giv’ati Parking Lot web site. They used Fourier remodel infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy—which measures the absorption of infrared mild to find out to what diploma a pattern had been heated—and archaeomagnetic evaluation, which determines whether or not samples containing magnetic minerals have been sufficiently heated to reorient these compounds to a brand new magnetic north.
The evaluation revealed various levels of publicity to high-temperature hearth in three rooms (designated A, B, and C) on the backside stage of Building 100, with Room C displaying the most blatant proof. This may need been an indication that Room C was the ignition level, however there was no hearth path; the burning of Room C seemed to be remoted. Combined with an earlier 2020 examine on segments of the second stage of the constructing, the authors concluded that a number of fires have been lit in the constructing and the fires burned strongest in the higher flooring, apart from that “intense native hearth” in Room C on the first stage.
“When a construction burns, warmth rises and is concentrated under the ceiling,” the authors wrote. “The partitions and roof are due to this fact heated to larger temperatures than the ground.” The presence of charred beams on the flooring recommend this was certainly the case: most of the warmth rose to the ceiling, burning the beams till they collapsed to the flooring, which in any other case have been subjected to radiant warmth. But the extent of the particles was probably not induced simply by that collapse, suggesting that the Babylonians intentionally went again in and knocked down any remaining partitions.
Furthermore, “They focused the extra necessary, the extra well-known buildings in the metropolis,” Shalom informed New Scientist, quite than destroying every little thing indiscriminately. “2600 years later, we’re nonetheless mourning the temple.”
While they discovered no proof of further fuels which may have served as accelerants, “we might assume the hearth was deliberately ignited attributable to its widespread presence in all rooms and each tales of the constructing,” Shalom et al. concluded. “The finds inside the rooms point out there was sufficient flammable materials (vegetal and picket gadgets and building materials) to make further gasoline pointless. The widespread presence of charred stays suggests a deliberate destruction by hearth…. [T]he unfold of the hearth and the speedy collapse of the constructing point out that the destroyers invested nice efforts to utterly demolish the constructing and take it out of use.”
DOI: Journal of Archaeological Science, 2023. 10.1016/j.jas.2023.105823 (About DOIs).