The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has been utilizing an AI-powered software known as Giant Oak Search Technology (GOST) to scan visa applicants’ social media posts since 2014, in line with paperwork obtained by a Freedom of Information Act motion.
According to an Oct. 27 TechSpot report, the system provides applicants a “social media score” from 1-100 based mostly on whether or not their posts are deemed “derogatory” in direction of the United States. ICE analysts can then assessment flagged pictures and profiles to find out if applicants are a danger.
ICE has paid Giant Oak over $10 million since 2017 for the expertise, which additionally has contracts with the DEA, Air Force, State Department, and Treasury Department. Privacy advocates argue this sort of AI screening raises vital civil liberties points.
Should the federal government use algorithms to go looking social media to find out who’s “risky?”
“The government should not be using algorithms to scrutinize our social media posts and decide which of us is ‘risky,’” mentioned Patrick Toomey deputy director of the ACLU’s nationwide safety venture. “DHS needs to explain to the public how its systems determine whether someone is a risk or not, and what happens to the people whose online posts are flagged by its algorithms.”
The social media surveillance program began as a 2016 pilot concentrating on potential visa overstayers. That similar 12 months, the Trump administration applied guidelines requiring visa applicants to supply 5 years of social media historical past.
Experts warn these practices might result in discrimination, with applicants from sure nations or backgrounds extra more likely to be flagged by automated techniques. In 2019, a Harvard pupil was denied entry to the U.S. as a result of of pals’ social media exercise.
According to the data, ICE’s contract with Giant Oak led to 2022. Still, the apply of utilizing AI to evaluate applicants’ social media raises questions on privateness, accountability, and equity in immigration enforcement. More oversight is required to forestall abuse and shield civil liberties.
Featured Image Credit: Photo by Karolina Grabowska; Pexels; Thank you!