Close Menu
Ztoog
    What's Hot
    Crypto

    Forget High Gas Fee Challenges, Ethereum Remains Bullish: Time To Buy More?

    Science

    NASA is developing a Mars helicopter that could land itself from orbit

    Mobile

    TikTok sues Montana over statewide ban

    Important Pages:
    • About Us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    Ztoog
    • Home
    • The Future

      Any wall can be turned into a camera to see around corners

      JD Vance and President Trump’s Sons Hype Bitcoin at Las Vegas Conference

      AI may already be shrinking entry-level jobs in tech, new research suggests

      Today’s NYT Strands Hints, Answer and Help for May 26 #449

      LiberNovo Omni: The World’s First Dynamic Ergonomic Chair

    • Technology

      A Replit employee details a critical security flaw in web apps created using AI-powered app builder Lovable that exposes API keys and personal info of app users (Reed Albergotti/Semafor)

      Gemini in Google Drive can now help you skip watching that painfully long Zoom meeting

      Apple iPhone exports from China to the US fall 76% as India output surges

      Today’s NYT Wordle Hints, Answer and Help for May 26, #1437

      5 Skills Kids (and Adults) Need in an AI World – O’Reilly

    • Gadgets

      8 Best Vegan Meal Delivery Services and Kits (2025), Tested and Reviewed

      Google Home is getting deeper Gemini integration and a new widget

      Google Announces AI Ultra Subscription Plan With Premium Features

      Google shows off Android XR-based glasses, announces Warby Parker team-up

      The market’s down, but this OpenAI for the stock market can help you trade up

    • Mobile

      Microsoft is done being subtle – this new tool screams “upgrade now”

      Wallpaper Wednesday: Android wallpapers 2025-05-28

      Google can make smart glasses accessible with Warby Parker, Gentle Monster deals

      vivo T4 Ultra specs leak

      Forget screens: more details emerge on the mysterious Jony Ive + OpenAI device

    • Science

      Analysts Say Trump Trade Wars Would Harm the Entire US Energy Sector, From Oil to Solar

      Do we have free will? Quantum experiments may soon reveal the answer

      Was Planet Nine exiled from the solar system as a baby?

      How farmers can help rescue water-loving birds

      A trip to the farm where loofahs grow on vines

    • AI

      Rationale engineering generates a compact new tool for gene therapy | Ztoog

      The AI Hype Index: College students are hooked on ChatGPT

      Learning how to predict rare kinds of failures | Ztoog

      Anthropic’s new hybrid AI model can work on tasks autonomously for hours at a time

      AI learns how vision and sound are connected, without human intervention | Ztoog

    • Crypto

      GameStop bought $500 million of bitcoin

      CoinW Teams Up with Superteam Europe to Conclude Solana Hackathon and Accelerate Web3 Innovation in Europe

      Ethereum Net Flows Turn Negative As Bulls Push For $3,500

      Bitcoin’s Power Compared To Nuclear Reactor By Brazilian Business Leader

      Senate advances GENIUS Act after cloture vote passes

    Ztoog
    Home » An AI challenge only humans can solve | Ztoog
    AI

    An AI challenge only humans can solve | Ztoog

    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp
    An AI challenge only humans can solve | Ztoog
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp

    The Dark Ages weren’t completely darkish. Advances in agriculture and constructing expertise elevated Medieval wealth and led to a wave of cathedral building in Europe. However, it was a time of profound inequality. Elites captured nearly all financial positive aspects. In Britain, as Canterbury Cathedral soared upward, peasants had no web enhance in wealth between 1100 and 1300. Life expectancy hovered round 25 years. Chronic malnutrition was rampant.

    “We’ve been struggling to share prosperity for a long time,” says MIT Professor Simon Johnson. “Every cathedral that your parents dragged you to see in Europe is a symbol of despair and expropriation, made possible by higher productivity.”

    At a look, this may not appear related to life in 2023. But Johnson and his MIT colleague Daron Acemoglu, each economists, suppose it’s. Technology drives financial progress. As improvements take maintain, one perpetual query is: Who advantages?

    This applies, the students imagine, to automation and synthetic intelligence, which is the main focus of a brand new e book by Acemoglu and Johnson, “Power and Progress: Our 1000-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity,” printed this week by PublicAffairs. In it, they look at who reaped the rewards from previous improvements and who could acquire from AI at the moment, economically and politically.

    “The book is about the choices we make with technology,” Johnson says. “That’s a very MIT type of theme. But a lot of people feel technology just descends on you, and you have to live with it.”

    AI may develop as a useful power, Johnson says. However, he provides, “Many algorithms are being designed to try to replace humans as much as possible. We think that’s entirely wrong. The way we make progress with technology is by making machines useful to people, not displacing them. In the past we have had automation, but with new tasks for people to do and sufficient countervailing power in society.”

    Today, AI is a instrument of social management for some governments that additionally creates riches for a small variety of individuals, based on Acemoglu and Johnson. “The current path of AI is neither good for the economy nor for democracy, and these two problems, unfortunately, reinforce each other,” they write.

    A return to shared prosperity?

    Acemoglu and Johnson have collaborated earlier than; within the early 2000s, with political scientist James Robinson, they produced influential papers about politics and financial progress. Acemoglu, an Institute Professor at MIT, additionally co-authored with Robinson the books “Why Nations Fail” (2012), about political establishments and progress, and “The Narrow Corridor” (2019), which casts liberty because the never-assured consequence of social battle.

    Johnson, the Ronald A. Kurtz Professor of Entrepreneurship on the MIT Sloan School of Management, wrote “13 Bankers” (2010), about finance reform, and, with MIT economist Jonathan Gruber, “Jump-Starting America” (2019), a name for extra funding in scientific analysis.

    In “Power and Progress,” the authors emphasize that expertise has created outstanding long-term advantages. As they write, “we are greatly better off than our ancestors,” and “scientific and technological progress is a vital part of that story.”

    Still, loads of struggling and oppression has occurred whereas the long run is unfolding, and never simply throughout Medieval instances.  

    “It was a 100-year struggle during the Industrial Revolution for workers to get any cut of these massive productivity gains in textiles and railways,” Johnson observes. Broader progress has come by elevated labor energy and electoral authorities; when the U.S. financial system grew spectacularly for 3 a long time after World War II, positive aspects had been extensively distributed, although that has not been the case not too long ago.

    “We’re suggesting we can get back onto that path of shared prosperity, reharness technology for everybody, and get productivity gains,” Johnson says. “We had all that in the postwar period. We can get it back, but not with the current form of our machine intelligence obsession. That, we think, is undermining prosperity in the U.S. and around the world.”

    A name for “machine usefulness,” not “so-so automation”

    What do Acemoglu and Johnson suppose is poor about AI? For one factor, they imagine the event of AI is simply too centered on mimicking human intelligence. The students are skeptical of the notion that AI mirrors human pondering all advised — even issues just like the chess program AlphaZero, which they regard extra as a specialised set of directions.

    Or, for example, picture recognition applications — Is {that a} husky or a wolf? — use massive knowledge units of previous human choices to construct predictive fashions. But these are sometimes correlation-dependent (a husky is extra more likely to be in entrance of your own home), and can’t replicate the identical cues humans depend on. Researchers know this, after all, and hold refining their instruments. But Acemoglu and Robinson contend that many AI applications are much less agile than the human thoughts, and suboptimal replacements for it, at the same time as AI is designed to exchange human work.

    Acemoglu, who has printed many papers on automation and robots, calls these alternative instruments “so-so technologies.” A grocery store self-checkout machine doesn’t add significant financial productiveness; it simply transfers work to prospects and wealth to shareholders. Or, amongst extra refined AI instruments, for example, a customer support line utilizing AI that doesn’t handle a given downside can frustrate individuals, main them to vent as soon as they do attain a human and making the entire course of much less environment friendly.

    All advised, Acemoglu and Johnson write, “neither traditional digital technologies nor AI can perform essential tasks that involve social interaction, adaptation, flexibility, and communication.”

    Instead, growth-minded economists desire applied sciences creating “marginal productivity” positive aspects, which compel companies to rent extra staff. Instead of aiming to get rid of medical specialists like radiologists, a much-forecast AI growth that has not occurred, Acemoglu and Johnson counsel AI instruments may develop what residence well being care staff can do, and make their companies extra beneficial, with out lowering staff within the sector.

    “We think there is a fork in the road, and it’s not too late — AI is a very good opportunity to reassert machine usefulness as a philosophy of design,” Johnson says. “And to look for ways to put tools in the hands of workers, including lower-wage workers.”

    Defining the dialogue

    Another set of AI points Acemoglu and Johnson are involved about lengthen immediately into politics: Surveillance applied sciences, facial-recognition instruments, intensive knowledge assortment, and AI-spread misinformation.

    China deploys AI to create “social credit” scores for residents, together with heavy surveillance, whereas tightly proscribing freedom of expression. Elsewhere, social media platforms use algorithms to affect what customers see; by emphasizing “engagement” above different priorities, they can unfold dangerous misinformation.

    Indeed, all through “Power and Progress,” Acemoglu and Johnson emphasize that the usage of AI can arrange self-reinforcing dynamics through which those that profit economically can acquire political affect and energy on the expense of wider democratic participation.

    To alter this trajectory, Acemoglu and Johnson advocate for an in depth menu of coverage responses, together with knowledge possession for web customers (an concept of technologist Jaron Lanier); tax reform that rewards employment greater than automation; authorities help for a variety of high-tech analysis instructions; repealing Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which protects on-line platforms from regulation or authorized motion primarily based on the content material they host; and a digital promoting tax (aimed to restrict the profitability of algorithm-driven misinformation).

    Johnson believes individuals of all ideologies have incentives to help such measures: “The point we’re making is not a partisan point,” he says.

    Other students have praised “Power and Progress.” Michael Sandel, the Anne T. and Robert M. Bass Professor of Government at Harvard University, has known as it a “humane and hopeful book” that “shows how we can steer technology to promote the public good,” and is “required reading for everyone who cares about the fate of democracy in a digital age.”

    For their half, Acemoglu and Johnson need to broaden the general public dialogue of AI past trade leaders, discard notions concerning the AI inevitability, and suppose once more about human company, social priorities, and financial prospects.

    “Debates on new technology ought to center not just on the brilliance of new products and algorithms but on whether they are working for the people or against the people,” they write.

    “We need these discussions,” Johnson says. “There’s nothing inherent in technology. It’s within our control. Even if you think we can’t say no to new technology, you can channel it, and get better outcomes from it, if you talk about it.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp

    Related Posts

    AI

    Rationale engineering generates a compact new tool for gene therapy | Ztoog

    AI

    The AI Hype Index: College students are hooked on ChatGPT

    AI

    Learning how to predict rare kinds of failures | Ztoog

    AI

    Anthropic’s new hybrid AI model can work on tasks autonomously for hours at a time

    AI

    AI learns how vision and sound are connected, without human intervention | Ztoog

    AI

    How AI is introducing errors into courtrooms

    AI

    With AI, researchers predict the location of virtually any protein within a human cell | Ztoog

    AI

    Google DeepMind’s new AI agent cracks real-world problems better than humans can

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    Top Posts
    Technology

    Trade business software provider ServiceTitan offers an IPO share price range at $52-$57 and plans to buy back the shares of its non-convertible preferred stock (Julie Bort/Ztoog)

    Julie Bort / Ztoog: Trade business software provider ServiceTitan offers an IPO share price range…

    Crypto

    Ethereum Drops Below The 100-Day Moving Average

    The crypto market is experiencing a pullback after Bitcoin, the main cryptocurrency, reached a brand…

    Science

    The US Buried Nuclear Waste Abroad. Climate Change Could Unearth It

    This story initially appeared on Grist and is a part of the Climate Desk collaboration.Ariana…

    Science

    Neanderthals and modern humans intermingled in Europe 45,000 years ago

    About a decade ago, the speculation that Neanderthals had bred with Homo sapiens exterior of…

    The Future

    Alex Jones is Back on X, Thanks to Elon Musk

    Half a decade after he was kicked off Twitter by the platform’s security group, skilled…

    Our Picks
    Crypto

    Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin, Polygon’s Sandeep Nailwal Donate $100 Million To COVID-19 Research

    Gadgets

    ZTE nubia Flip 5G Unveiled As A Cost-Effective Alternative Foldable Phone

    Crypto

    Bearish Sentiment Hits EOS As Bulls Lose Control, What Lies Ahead?

    Categories
    • AI (1,493)
    • Crypto (1,753)
    • Gadgets (1,804)
    • Mobile (1,850)
    • Science (1,866)
    • Technology (1,802)
    • The Future (1,648)
    Most Popular
    Gadgets

    Alienware Introduces World’s First QD-OLED Gaming Monitors At CES 2024

    Technology

    Best Fire and Waterproof Safe Box for 2023

    AI

    Exclusive: Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI’s chief scientist, on his hopes and fears for the future of AI

    Ztoog
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    © 2025 Ztoog.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.