Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
TL;DR
- Google Messages for Web is probably going going to increase its authentication system.
- Instead of scanning a QR code, you’ll authenticate by signing into the identical Google account.
- Finally, it appears you’ll approve the connection via an Emoji picker.
Since Google began providing the Messages for Web service, you’ve authenticated the connection between your cellphone and laptop (or pill) by scanning a QR code. Scanning the code affirmed that you simply have been the gadget’s proprietor and allowed your secondary gadget to entry, reply to, and in any other case manipulate your texts. The main exception right here is Google Fi customers, who simply log in to the online portal utilizing their Fi account.
Thankfully, it appears like authentication will get simpler, extra intuitive, and possibly even slightly extra enjoyable for everybody. According to an APK teardown carried out by 9to5Google, Google is probably going engaged on an account-based system for Messages authentication. This signifies that everybody —not simply Fi subscribers — can join their account to the online by logging into the identical Google account they use on their telephones. Easy!
As an additional layer of safety, there may be an Emoji-based two-factor authentication system. When you log in at Messages for Web, you’ll be offered with a set of emojis. You’ll then want to faucet that very same set of emojis in your cellphone to show it’s you. Conversely, you may hit the “No, it’s not me” hyperlink to sever the connection.
This system sounds approach higher than the QR code scanning technique. However, it does seem that Google will preserve that system energetic when you favor it. We’d anticipate the corporate to ultimately sundown this technique, nevertheless it ought to stay a selection initially.
Google hasn’t formally introduced or rolled out this characteristic, so there’s no telling when (or even when) this may occur. Given how 9to5Google’s analysis exhibits the characteristic to be just about full, although, we’d anticipate it quickly. Maybe earlier than the tip of the yr?