Can the Exynos Galaxy S24 beat the last-gen Snapdragon 8 Gen 2?

Clearly, the Exynos 2400 is on the B-team, as Samsung makes use of a special chip for its super-premium flagship. Still, we’ve had the Exynos mannequin in our benchmarking lab to see the way it stacks up in opposition to this yr’s and final yr’s rivals. Let’s dive straight into the outcomes.

With the newest Arm Cortex-X4 onboard and ten CPU cores in whole, the Exynos 2400 is not any slouch in the GeekBench 6 take a look at. It outscores final yr’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy and is true in the combine with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 inside our Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. In different phrases, Exynos prospects received’t undergo a second-tier expertise in terms of working the most demanding apps.

PCMark Work 3.0, a normal gauge of assorted widespread workloads, additionally showcases greater scores for Exynos versus final yr’s Snapdragon-only mannequin. However, it isn’t fairly at the identical stage as the 8 Gen 3 Ultra we have now in hand.

Turning to 3DMark’s number of graphics stress assessments, we begin to see the Exynos 2400’s weak point — its AMD Xclipse 940 GPU. The Exynos 2400 Galaxy S24 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Galaxy S23 produce eerily comparable leads to our Wild Life stress take a look at. Both are fairly a way behind the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3-powered Galaxy S24 Ultra and different 8 Gen 3 telephones we’ve examined lately. Unfortunately, all these telephones have fairly garbage stability as temperatures rise.

We see greater peak efficiency from the newest Exynos in the extra demanding Wild Life Extreme and ray tracing Solar Bay assessments. However, the cellphone once more throttles again shortly, falling beneath the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 after 4 runs of the Extreme take a look at. That’s a little bit of a priority. However, AMD’s RDNA 3 structure retains its nostril out in entrance in terms of ray tracing and palms in a end result that’s on par with the Ultra’s 8 Gen 3. This suggests the 8 Gen 3 is bottlenecked by its ray tracing capabilities in comparison with AMD’s structure.

So why is the Exynos 2400 higher in some assessments than others, effectively, it appears to come back right down to temperature. While the Exynos 2400 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ended up at the identical last temperature (46.5 °C ) in all three of our stress assessments, the Galaxy S24 mannequin was quicker to warmth up. Hence, we noticed the lackluster sustained efficiency, and this throttling happens quicker and has an even bigger impression when body charges are greater (reminiscent of Wild Life relatively than Extreme).

What does this imply for players? Well, it will depend on the title, however regardless of the less-than-brilliant outcomes, the Exynos-powered Galaxy S24 is clearly no slouch. Last yr’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 was already very good at gaming, and we’re taking a look at an analogous efficiency stage with the new Exynos in the worst case. In reality, the Exynos Galaxy S24 will energy forward with the newest titles that make the most of ray tracing graphics, so it’s a extra future-proof chip in that regard. However, I wouldn’t advocate upgrading from a Galaxy S23 only for that.

Of course, this implies the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Exynos 2400 Galaxy S24 debate isn’t shaping up brilliantly for Samsung’s chipset. Global prospects in search of peak efficiency ought to significantly think about stumping up the additional money for the Galaxy S24 Ultra, particularly in the event that they’re critical players.