Intro
Nothing made a daring alternative for a startup telephone firm — it launched a midranger! Jokes apart, the flagship Nothing Phone (2) was well-received, however it’s nonetheless a distinct segment system. Yet, Nothing was assured sufficient to launch the inexpensive $350 Phone (2a) — nearly half off the MSRP of the Phone (2), which begins at $600.
Quick word, at the time of scripting this, the Phone (2) is discounted and you may seize the 12 GB / 256 GB mannequin for $550.
OK, so corners needed to be minimize to make the Phone (2a) so inexpensive. Does it handle to ship the core Nothing expertise? Is it a lot worse than the Phone (2) or does it possibly excel in some areas (trace, nudge, the digicam!)? Let’s discover!
Nothing Phone (2a) vs Phone (2) variations defined:
| Nothing Phone (2a) | Nothing Phone (2) |
|---|---|
| Full plastic construct, Gorilla Glass entrance | Metal body, glass sandwich |
| Smaller, 3-segment Glyph Interface | Full Glyph over the whole again |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro 12 GB / 256 GB (US mannequin) |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 GB / 128 GB 12 GB / 256 GB 12 GB / 512 GB |
| 50 MP digicam, however new algorithms | 50 MP digicam |
| 5,000 mAh battery | 4,700 mAh battery |
| No wi-fi charging | Wireless charging and reverse wi-fi |
Table of Contents:
Design and Display Quality
Secrets of The Glyph
Even if the Nothing Phone (2a) has a plastic construct, its design completely carries that Nothing DNA. To the level the place choosing them up chilly from the desk and simply the two telephones from the entrance — you could possibly be simply confused which is which. The Phone (2a)’s body has this grainy matte end, which provides a greater really feel to it, and its bezels are as skinny as the flagship’s.
On the again, we’ve some large variations with the capera placement and that divisive bump that the Nothing Phone (2a) has. We do not thoughts it and we expect it seems to be higher in individual — or at the least it has been straightforward to get used to. The Glyph design is clearly additionally very completely different on each. The excellent news is that the (2a) has a strip for the Glyph Timer characteristic, the place you may flip the telephone over and watch a glowing progress bar observe time for you. The solely characteristic you’ll miss (at the least for now) is the tiny LED strip at the backside, which tracks charging progress on the Phone (2).
Glyph Timer is now a core Nothing characteristic (Image credit score – PhoneEnviornment)
The plastic again does have that heat really feel to it that is not as premium on the glass of the Phone (2). But it is attention-grabbing that Nothing budgeted for a Gorilla Glass 5 panel on the entrance, defending the Phone (2a) prefer it’s the premium Phone (2). Both of these gadgets even have IP54 score — restricted mud ingress safety and resistance to water splashes.
Both telephones have 6.7-inch AMOLED screens, which look just about an identical. They even have dynamic refresh charges, distinction being that the Phone (2a) goes from 30 Hz to 120 Hz, whereas the flagship Nothing Phone (2) has the wide selection of 1 – 120 Hz. Both are rated for HDR10+, have a 1080p decision, and a 240 Hz contact sampling price. Obviously, the Phone (2a) didn’t go together with a decrease high quality display, and that is fairly necessary — the display is your primary approach of interacting with the telephone.
Display Measurements:
For biometrics, each telephones have an optical fingerprint scanner underneath the display and so they appear to be of the similar high quality. They work comparatively shortly and are principally correct — we might typically get misreads on both system, that may require an additional scan or two. But we would not say that the Phone (2a) does this extra usually than the Phone (2).
Performance and Software
Midrange reveals its colours
Performance Benchmarks:
The solely conditions the place we may actually see the Phone (2a)’s efficiency wrestle — when taking a photograph and stepping into to preview it, it takes fairly some time for the telephone to course of it. And additionally, there’s some contact enter delay when gaming.
Is the Nothing Phone (2) quicker? Well, sure — it has a flagship chipset. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 could also be a pair of generations behind now, however it was once the prime canine of 2022, and it is nonetheless higher than a midrange chip of immediately. The Phone (2) is snappier, has higher contact response, and is rather more resilient if you throw heavy duties at it.
The Nothing interface matches the type of the Phones completely (Image credit score – PhoneEnviornment)
You also can obtain the Glyph Composer for each these telephones and create your individual ringtones, with glowing Glyph patterns. At its core, the Phone (2a) delivers that Nothing expertise totally, with the similar aesthetics and total vibe of each the software program and {hardware}.
Both telephones have been launched with a promise for 3 years of Android OS updates and 4 years of safety patches. This implies that the Nothing Phone (2) will finish assist in 2027, the Phone (2a) ought to final into early 2028. For Android builds — the Phone (2) ought to faucet out at Android 16, Phone (2a) may get Android 17.
Camera
Same sensors, alternative ways to cope with them
Peek a boo (Image credit score – PhoneEnviornment)
On paper, each telephones have the similar primary digicam — a 50 MP sensor underneath a lens with an F/1.88 aperture. In actuality, they’ve completely different chipsets, subsequently course of photographs in a different way. Nothing talked up its Ultra XDR engine — an evolution of HDR+ — that is been developed for the Phone (2a). Does this imply that the Phone (2) is left in the mud? Which one has the higher digicam? The photographs will inform us!
Main Camera – Day
Main Camera – Low-light
At night time they sort of commerce blow for blow. The Phone (2a) can look a bit hazier round the edges. Both aren’t excellent at night time, however the Nothing Phone (2) does handle to get sharper and barely extra sensible photographs extra usually than the new man.
Both of these lack a devoted zoom digicam, so it is inevitable that their zooms are purely digital. They hit their most at 10x magnification and we have been truthfully anticipating fairly related outcomes from each. However, the Phone (2) holds it collectively higher, total. At 2x zoom, you may already see the Phone (2a) amping up these sharpening abilities, with particulars like branches, grass, and leaves beginning to look jagged. At 10x, the Phone (2a) photographs disintegrate a bit greater than the Phone (2) ones. Mind you, none of these are masterpieces, however the flagship at the least provides you a clearer concept of the object you have been zooming in on.
Selfies
On the selfie aspect — shock, shock — barely completely different specs. Both have 32 MP sensors, however the Phone (2a) has a barely wider aperture at F/2.2, in comparison with F/2.45 on the Phone (2). The precise efficiency? Let’s see:
In the daytime, with a superb quantity of gentle, the Phone (2a) can seize a bit extra particulars from the face — fairly attention-grabbing. It does go only a bit heavy on the saturation, although. The Phone (2) retains the colours nearer to actuality — that is cool — however seems to be slightly bit softer. Some wonderful (unflattering) particulars in the face are misplaced and my beard seems to be only a bit hazier.
Video Quality
The primary digicam variations are much more pronounced on video. The Phone (2a) overexposes and saturates so much — in all probability because of an absence of processing energy, required for the 4K 30 FPS video samples above. Stabilization is sort of related on each telephones, however once more — the (2a) is a bit wonkier with maintaining with focus whereas additionally combating shaky fingers.
At night time, nevertheless, the high quality of the Phone (2) footage does drop and the Phone (2a) could look extra engaging just because it managed to tug extra gentle in. But do not stroll round and report video at night time with both of these telephones — it turns into fairly shaky.
Audio Quality and Haptics
Same speaker setups, neither wows (Image credit score – PhoneEnviornment)
The Phone (2)’s audio system have a bit extra roominess and bass to them, however only a bit. They haven’t got the similar mid hump as on the Phone (2a), which makes them sound as in the event that they lack in quantity, however at the least they do not get fatiguing after extended listening periods. These are additionally not nice for music, however work wonderful with the telephone’s interface.
The haptics on each gadgets are nice — fast and exact clicks that work in tandem with the Glyph patterns for very satisfying ringtones and interplay.
Battery Life and Charging
The Nothing Phone (2a) has a barely greater 5,000 mAh battery, over the 4,700 cell in the Phone (2). And it has a decrease energy processor. Logic dictates it ought to last more, sure? Well, not if we stress-test it with our battery benchmarks –
PhoneEnviornment Battery Test Results:
The excellent news is that, when utilizing it as an informal each day driver, it looks as if the Phone (2a)’s battery simply goes on and on and on. We would say that each of these handsets have a really dependable battery endurance.
Both assist as much as 45 W charging — the wallplug that Nothing sells on its web site. And each have battery well being optimizations in place, which is why we expect we could not squeeze the max charging velocity out of the Phone (2a).
No wi-fi charging coil in the Nothing Phone (2a), so… it sort of loses on this class by default.
Specs Comparison
OK, so let’s get the good ol’ dry specs battle out of the approach. Obviously, the 50% cheaper Phone (2a) could have completely different {hardware}, proper? Well, here is what these differrences are:
| Specs | Nothing Phone (2a) | Nothing Phone (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 6.41 x 3.00 x 0.34 in (162.74 x 76.32 x 8.55 mm) |
6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 in (162.1 x 76.4 x 8.6 mm) |
| Weight | 6.70 oz (190.0 g) | 7.10 oz (201.2 g) |
| Screen | 6.7 inches, AMOLED 2412 x 1084, 30-120 Hz |
6.7 inches, AMOLED 2412 x 1084, 1-120 Hz |
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro, 4 nm, 2.8 GHz | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, 4 nm, 3 GHz |
| RAM, Storage and Price | 12 GB / 256 GB – $349 | 8 GB / 128 GB – $599 12 GB / 256 GB – $699 12 GB / 512 GB – $799 |
| Cameras | 50 MP primary 50 MP ultra-wide 32 MP selfie |
50 MP primary 50 MP ultra-wide 32 MP selfie |
| Battery Size | 5,000 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Charging Speeds | 45 W wired | 45 W wired 15 W wi-fi |
The Phone 2a does are available barely completely different RAM and storage variations, relying on the place in the world you’re. In the States, it’s essential to register for the Developer / Tester program and you may nab it for $350, however solely in a single variant — 12 GB / 256 GB.
Summary and Final Verdict
Which one? (Image credit score – PhoneEnviornment)
Final verdict — should you can spare the further money, the Nothing Phone (2) continues to be value the leap. If you’re on a budget — the Nothing Phone (2a) is simply wonderful and it’ll serve you properly and look cool doing it.